[140574] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Routing study
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Owen DeLong)
Fri May 13 17:53:36 2011
From: Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com>
In-Reply-To: <20110513212206.GC8201@vacation.karoshi.com.>
Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 14:45:24 -0700
To: bmanning@vacation.karoshi.com
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
My guess would be that someone didn't get the memo about the use =
agreement
ending since they apparently still were listed in whois.
Just a thought. Might have been a legitimate mistake from a position of =
ignorance,
not knowing that they weren't still the registered resource holder.
Owen
On May 13, 2011, at 2:22 PM, bmanning@vacation.karoshi.com wrote:
>=20
> their use agreement ended in 2008. telling the nanog world they are =
going to reuse it
> three years later is not exactly what most would consider prior notice =
to the registered
> holder that they would like to do a research project wiht resources =
that are not registered
> to them.
>=20
> /bill
>=20
>=20
> On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 12:02:55PM -0400, Greg Whynott wrote:
>> On May 12, 2011, at 6:30 AM, <bmanning@vacation.karoshi.com> =
<bmanning@vacation.karoshi.com> wrote:
>>=20
>>> erb
>>> d I would appreciate it if they
>>> would at least notify me ahead of time if they want to futz around
>>> with prefixes that are not registered to them.
>>=20
>>=20
>> erb
>>=20
>> helps to read before you jump!
>>=20
>> -g
>>=20
>>=20
>> --
>>=20
>> This message and any attachments may contain confidential and/or =
privileged information for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any =
review or distribution by anyone other than the person for whom it was =
originally intended is strictly prohibited. If you have received this =
message in error, please contact the sender and delete all copies. =
Opinions, conclusions or other information contained in this message may =
not be that of the organization.
