[140565] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: IPv6 foot-dragging
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jeroen van Aart)
Fri May 13 15:17:27 2011
Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 12:16:37 -0700
From: Jeroen van Aart <jeroen@mompl.net>
To: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
In-Reply-To: <OF81F394AD.9E5D67EB-ON8525788E.004A7BFE-8525788E.004B364C@csc.com>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
Joe Loiacono wrote:
> Jeroen Massar <jeroen@unfix.org> wrote on 05/12/2011 09:19:21 AM:
>
>> On 2011-May-12 15:14, Joe Loiacono wrote:
>>> Anyone know roughly the current default-free routing table size for
> IPv6?
>> http://www.sixxs.net/tools/grh/status/
>
> Awesome web-site. The world of IPv6 routing on one page.
That is a great overview.
And really, if a conservative institution such as the *catholic church*
jumped on the IPv6 bandwagon there is really NO excuse for other
companies to drag their heels, for crying out loud. ;-)
http://www.sixxs.net/tools/whois/?AS8978
Greetings,
Jeroen
--
http://goldmark.org/jeff/stupid-disclaimers/
http://linuxmafia.com/~rick/faq/plural-of-virus.html
