[140562] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Interested in input on tunnels as an IPv6 transition technology
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Cameron Byrne)
Fri May 13 14:03:56 2011
In-Reply-To: <1305265953.18376.1032.camel@karl>
Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 11:03:17 -0700
From: Cameron Byrne <cb.list6@gmail.com>
To: Karl Auer <kauer@biplane.com.au>
Cc: NANOG List <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 10:52 PM, Karl Auer <kauer@biplane.com.au> wrote:
> Hullo all.
>
> I'm working on a talk, and would be interested to know what people think
> is good about tunnels as an IPv6 transition technology, and what people
> think is bad about tunnels.
>
> It would probably be best to let me know off-list :-) but I'm happy to
> summarise back to the list. Any references you have to useful papers,
> articles, discussions etc would also be appreciated.
>
> I'm looking for both general problems and advantages, but also
> advantages and disadvantages specific to particular tunnel types. It
> would also be helpful to know from what perspective particular things
> are good or bad, in so far as it isn't obvious. A carrier has a
> different perspective than, say, a home user, who will have a different
> perspective again to an enterprise user.
>
> Many thanks in advance for your input.
http://labs.ripe.net/Members/emileaben/6to4-why-is-it-so-bad
http://labs.ripe.net/Members/gih/testing-teredo
