[140484] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: IPv6 foot-dragging
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Joe Loiacono)
Thu May 12 09:42:33 2011
In-Reply-To: <4DCBDE59.2000001@unfix.org>
To: Jeroen Massar <jeroen@unfix.org>
From: Joe Loiacono <jloiacon@csc.com>
Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 09:41:31 -0400
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
Jeroen Massar <jeroen@unfix.org> wrote on 05/12/2011 09:19:21 AM:
> On 2011-May-12 15:14, Joe Loiacono wrote:
> > Anyone know roughly the current default-free routing table size for
IPv6?
>
> http://www.sixxs.net/tools/grh/status/
Awesome web-site. The world of IPv6 routing on one page.
> 3668 good/required prefixes
> Minimum of 271 prefixes (-3397)
> Average of 5322 prefixes (+1654)
Is this saying that poor aggregation has crept in already (to the tune of
45%)?
Given the RIR IPv6 allocation strategies, any estimate on the ultimate
size of the DFR IPv6 table and how much memory will be required?
> > Or, who holds the record for the largest IPv6 routing table at this
point?
>
> Having more routes does not mean that the routes are useful... far from
> actually...
Right. But isn't that dependent on peer's good aggregation and suppression
of bogons?
Joe
