[140482] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: IPv6 foot-dragging
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Bernhard Schmidt)
Thu May 12 09:22:41 2011
Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 15:20:50 +0200
From: Bernhard Schmidt <berni@birkenwald.de>
To: Joe Loiacono <jloiacon@csc.com>
In-Reply-To: <OF080DF5DA.086DB265-ON8525788E.0048780D-8525788E.0048BAA7@csc.com>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
Hi,
> Bernhard Schmidt <berni@birkenwald.de> wrote on 05/12/2011 06:27:38 AM:
>
>> Anthony Francis - Handy Networks LLC <anthony@handynetworks.com> wrote:
>>
>> > I can confirm full IPV6 connectivity from HE.
>>
>> How can you confirm that when HE just admitted to be lacking IPv6 routes
>> from Cogent and a couple of other players?
>
> Anyone know roughly the current default-free routing table size for IPv6?
grh.sixxs.net shows around 5600 prefixes for most participants. But it
depends on filters as well, I run strict filters (no more than /35 in PA
space) and have around 4300 prefixes.
> Or, who holds the record for the largest IPv6 routing table at this point?
I don't think the absolute number of prefixes is a valid metric. There
is too many more-specific junk with partial visibility floating around.
Bernhard
