[140443] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: 23,000 IP addresses
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Christopher Morrow)
Wed May 11 11:26:20 2011
In-Reply-To: <4DCAA831.1020902@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 11:26:16 -0400
From: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists@gmail.com>
To: William Allen Simpson <william.allen.simpson@gmail.com>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 11:16 AM, William Allen Simpson
<william.allen.simpson@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Courts like precedent. I choose Facebook's precedent. Seems reasonable to
>> me.
>>
> That's also roughly in line with Nextel and others for CALEA.
Hrm, I had thought that CALEA specifically removed the ability of the
Provider to charge for the 'service'? Though there is always the case
where the Provider can say: "Yes, this doesn't fall into the CALEA
relevant requests, we can do this for you though it will cost
time/materials to do, here's our schedule..."
or that's the stance a previous employer was taking... (at the
direction of their lawyer-catzen)
