[140433] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: 23,000 IP addresses
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Christopher Morrow)
Wed May 11 10:42:37 2011
In-Reply-To: <4DCA859A.3040205@csuohio.edu>
Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 10:42:33 -0400
From: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists@gmail.com>
To: Michael Holstein <michael.holstein@csuohio.edu>
Cc: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 8:48 AM, Michael Holstein
<michael.holstein@csuohio.edu> wrote:
>
>>> I wonder how things go if you challenge them in court. =A0This is surel=
y a
>>> topic for another list, but it seems to me it'd be fairly difficult to
>>> prove unless they downloaded part of the movie from your IP and verifie=
d
>>> that what they got really was a part of the movie.
>
> I have the netflow records to prove this is NOT the case. All
> MediaSentry (et.al.) do is scrape the tracker. We have also received a
> number of takedown notices that have numbers transposed, involve parts
> of our netblock that were not in use at the time in question, etc.
this is exactly the same situation I outlined previously...
darknet/tcdump can't be a bittorrent user.
> I would think that whole "penalty of perjury" thing would have some
> weight behind it.
apparently not :( (I'd say something about lobbyists et.al, but...)
-chris
