[140419] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: 23,000 IP addresses
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Mark Radabaugh)
Tue May 10 22:36:24 2011
Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 22:35:37 -0400
From: Mark Radabaugh <mark@amplex.net>
To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTi=jUPG+uAA37rV-nShdGOFRiR1QwA@mail.gmail.com>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On 5/10/11 8:30 PM, Jimmy Hess wrote:
> On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 8:54 AM, Mark Radabaugh<mark@amplex.net> wrote:
>> On 5/10/11 9:07 AM, Marshall Eubanks wrote:
>> A good reason why every ISP should have a published civil subpoena
>> compliance fee.
>> 23,000 * $150 each should only cost them $3.45M to get the information.
>> Seems like that would take the profit out pretty quickly.
> +1.
> But don't the fees actually have to be reasonable?
>
Facebook charges $150.00 (not a great link but
http://lawyerist.com/subpoena-facebook-information/
Finding that on facebook's site is difficult. Other sites have Facebook
charging $250 to $500 for civil subpoena fees.
Courts like precedent. I choose Facebook's precedent. Seems reasonable
to me.
Mark
