[140414] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Yahoo and IPv6
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Matthew Petach)
Tue May 10 21:52:59 2011
In-Reply-To: <C6AEEC24-AA5D-4B73-88C8-FE644AE8DA94@muada.com>
Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 18:52:53 -0700
From: Matthew Petach <mpetach@netflight.com>
To: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com>
Cc: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 1:58 PM, Iljitsch van Beijnum
<iljitsch@muada.com> wrote:
> On 10 mei 2011, at 22:31, Warren Kumari wrote:
>> I'm also a little surprised that you figured that there were no plans pa=
st the event -- much of the point of this is for data gathering -- did you =
figure folk were just going to gather the data and then ignore it?
>
> I asked the ISOC press people about this after they sent me their press r=
elease but they never replied (they may have replied to my message but not =
with an answer to the question). There is nothing on the ISOC site that men=
tions anything happening after june 8.
>
> Of course I'm assuming individual participants will do stuff, but that do=
esn't change that this IPv6 day as it stands now is a one-off event, not th=
e first step towards the Ultimate Goal.
>
Speaking only for myself, and not for anybody at all, I wouldn't be terribl=
y
surprised if the 24 hour experiment goes smoothly to see it followed up
by a week-long trial round the next time.
If it doesn't go well, I imagine there will be much data analysis, figuring
out what needs to be fixed, and a "24 hour trial, take 2" once a sufficient
level of fixage has occurred.
Matt
