[140405] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Downstream Usage-BGP Communites
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Richard A Steenbergen)
Tue May 10 19:15:58 2011
Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 18:15:52 -0500
From: Richard A Steenbergen <ras@e-gerbil.net>
To: Nick Olsen <nick@flhsi.com>
In-Reply-To: <24fe796b$74b5933f$2953abcf$@com>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 06:47:11PM -0400, Nick Olsen wrote:
> Ah, Sorry for the confusion.
> We have a mutual agreement with AS100 (call it transit or peering) we send
> them full routes, They send us full routes.
> AS100 is a transit customer of AS4323.
> I understand I would be at the mercy of how people have things setup. I do
> know for a fact I'm not filtered by AS100 as I've already tested it.
> Thanks to everyone for the info so far.
Erm ok, well as long as you're a transit customer of AS100 (for some
definition of transit customer), and they're a transit customer of
AS4323, you should have no problems. This is completely different from
"peering", when money changes hands communities get listened to. :)
--
Richard A Steenbergen <ras@e-gerbil.net> http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC)
