[140315] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: Yahoo and IPv6

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jeff Wheeler)
Mon May 9 17:58:02 2011

In-Reply-To: <A674A144-70BA-495B-BC4C-38886160495D@puck.nether.net>
Date: Mon, 9 May 2011 17:57:18 -0400
From: Jeff Wheeler <jsw@inconcepts.biz>
To: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org

On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 4:41 PM, Jared Mauch <jared@puck.nether.net> wrote:
> I'd like to see more progress getting there than finger pointing.

I would, too; but one harsh reality is that vendors are driven by
RFPs, not by what they consciously know their customers will need in
the near future.  Why should vendors invest money in features that
aren't needed to sell routers?  If customers are dumb enough to buy
them anyway, they'll buy *another* router to get those features in the
future.

I do take issue with your suggestion that /64 LANs are in any way
smart in the datacenter.  They are not.  I have some slides on this
topic: http://inconcepts.biz/~jsw/IPv6_NDP_Exhaustion.pdf

--=20
Jeff S Wheeler <jsw@inconcepts.biz>
Sr Network Operator=A0 /=A0 Innovative Network Concepts


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post