[140157] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

PCH survey on peering

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Bill Woodcock)
Wed May 4 06:07:38 2011

From: Bill Woodcock <woody@pch.net>
Date: Wed, 4 May 2011 03:06:09 -0700
To: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


Over the past several months, Packet Clearing House has been working on =
a survey of peering agreements, to which many of you responded.  We are =
very grateful for your participation, and would like to share the =
resulting report:

    =
https://pch.net/resources/papers/peering-survey/PCH-Peering-Survey-2011.pd=
f

I anticipate that we will repeat this exercise in the future, perhaps a =
year from now, perhaps five years from now, depending upon how much =
demand we get for updates in the future.  If you feel that your =
perspective was insufficiently represented in our dataset, we would be =
very happy to include your information in future iterations.

Thank you all very much,

                                -Bill Woodcock
                                 Research Director
                                 Packet Clearing House





-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (Darwin)

iEYEARECAAYFAk3BJREACgkQGvQy4xTRsBEzrgCgqt1kk2UXALiYByXrDt+UIs5s
GC8AoIbJNJZZ8h4mM9ybPVrKGCzOO2zX
=3DaXGo
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post