[139978] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: IPv6 Prefix announcing
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Michael K. Smith - Adhost)
Tue Apr 26 16:18:02 2011
From: "Michael K. Smith - Adhost" <mksmith@adhost.com>
To: Seth Mattinen <sethm@rollernet.us>, "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2011 20:17:04 +0000
In-Reply-To: <4DB7225F.10408@rollernet.us>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Seth Mattinen [mailto:sethm@rollernet.us]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2011 12:52 PM
> To: nanog@nanog.org
> Subject: Re: IPv6 Prefix announcing
>=20
> On 4/26/2011 09:39, Kate Gerry wrote:
> > Funny enough, some carriers actually require the 'smallest' as being /3=
2... :(
> >
>=20
> This is becoming the exception now, not the rule.
>=20
> Last year I was fighting with Verizon about their refusal to carry /48s.
> That, together with the impasse of figuring out how to put dual stack
> IPv6 on an Ethernet port (it was delivered as IPv4 only multiple times),
> I never accepted it and went with a competitor who got it right the
> first time. However, I've had several sources tell me Verizon has since
> backpedaled and now accepts /48s.
>=20
> ~Seth
*> 2001:67C:120::/48 2001:504:16::1B1B 150 0 6939 701 12702 43751 6716=
i
Mike
