[139782] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Comcast's 6to4 Relays
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jared Mauch)
Tue Apr 19 17:52:44 2011
From: Jared Mauch <jared@puck.nether.net>
In-Reply-To: <4DAE0396.7050409@dougbarton.us>
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2011 17:52:32 -0400
To: Doug Barton <dougb@dougbarton.us>
Cc: NANOG <nanog@nanog.org>, "Brzozowski,
John" <John_Brzozowski@Cable.Comcast.com>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Apr 19, 2011, at 5:50 PM, Doug Barton wrote:
> At minimum one would hope that you're heeding the warnings in the =
first. Another view (one that I personally hold) is that any effort you =
might be putting into making 6to4 work better would be better placed in =
deploying real IPv6 instead; and that the world would be a better place =
generally if all of the so-called "transition mechanisms" just went =
away.
I certainly feel that the lawful-intercept requirements and data =
retention necessary in a CGN/6to4 environment likely mean the barrier is =
high enough to suggest moving to IPv6, but the CPE situation is still =
mostly missing.
- Jared=
