[139746] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: IPv4 address exchange

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Benson Schliesser)
Mon Apr 18 22:40:07 2011

From: Benson Schliesser <bensons@queuefull.net>
In-Reply-To: <m239lfyobr.wl%randy@psg.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2011 21:40:29 -0500
To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
Cc: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org

Hi, Randy.

On Apr 18, 2011, at 9:20 PM, Randy Bush wrote:

>> I introduced several policy proposals to ARIN that deal with the
>> question of authority and ownership.
>> ...
>> If anybody on NANOG supports these concepts, please express your
>> support to PPML so that the proposals can move forward.
>=20
> perhaps, if you are seeking support for commercial activity, you =
should
> make your employment more clear and declare any conflicts of interest.

Fair enough.

I am employed by Cisco Systems, but all of my statements are my own and =
I do not represent my employer.  I believe that my employer may benefit =
from any policy that makes IP addresses more available to more of our =
customers - we can perhaps sell more routers if more people have =
addresses - but nobody from Cisco has encouraged me to work in this =
topic.  Otherwise, I have no commercial interest in the outcome of the =
policy proposals that I've made.  The proposals that I've put forward =
are an honest attempt to motivate conversation.

If anybody has any doubts and/or I can clarify anything about my =
interests, let me know.

Cheers,
-Benson



home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post