[139703] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: NANOG Digest, Vol 39, Issue 52
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu)
Sun Apr 17 10:53:40 2011
To: Coy Hile <coy.hile@coyhile.com>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 17 Apr 2011 13:24:40 -0000."
<BANLkTi=PAEcWNYt2DwvcLkGKmJhxOueupQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Date: Sun, 17 Apr 2011 10:52:51 -0400
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
--==_Exmh_1303051971_54890P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Sun, 17 Apr 2011 13:24:40 -0000, Coy Hile said:
> I wonder how well something like the following would work (seen in
> paid fire/EMS circles):
>
> 24 on, 48 off.
Note that for much of those 24 on, the people are actually on downtime on site
in case the buzzer goes off. Heck, the station even has enough beds in it for
half the crew to be asleep. ;) So probably *not* applicable to NOC scheduling.
--==_Exmh_1303051971_54890P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001
iD8DBQFNqv7DcC3lWbTT17ARApIiAJ9uf6KjVmjhdG0fnLYPmno1cOT7nQCeJMv4
ZjJ0QfXaH1ph59noe6GcDWM=
=jjp/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--==_Exmh_1303051971_54890P--
