[139418] in North American Network Operators' Group

home	help	back	first	fref	pref	prev	next	nref	lref	last	post

Re: v6 Avian Carriers?

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu)
Thu Apr 7 15:37:24 2011

To: Jeroen van Aart <jeroen@mompl.net>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 07 Apr 2011 12:23:12 PDT."
	<4D9E0F20.1090004@mompl.net>
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2011 15:35:53 -0400
Cc: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org

--==_Exmh_1302204953_4917P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

On Thu, 07 Apr 2011 12:23:12 PDT, Jeroen van Aart said:
> Sachs, Marcus Hans (Marc) wrote:
> > http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6214/
> 
> That RFC is the opposite of funny (to me). Just because rfc1149 is funny 
> that doesn't mean that repetitions of it are funny too. Quite the contrary.

Yes, but I bet many providers recognize rfc1149 now.  rfc6214 gives us a new
brown M&M to put into the contracts...

--==_Exmh_1302204953_4917P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001

iD8DBQFNnhIZcC3lWbTT17ARAoQhAKDIHVR/vR0xlq3W6gi4Q2pumu2BJgCeOV+S
4VyzQZKzbOzP8Tjo1ejHs7w=
=0fb0
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--==_Exmh_1302204953_4917P--

home	help	back	first	fref	pref	prev	next	nref	lref	last	post