[139353] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: HIJACKED: 159.223.0.0/16 -- WTF? Does anybody care?

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu)
Mon Apr 4 15:45:07 2011

To: Jason Baugher <jason@thebaughers.com>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 04 Apr 2011 14:30:41 CDT."
	<4D9A1C61.6070401@thebaughers.com>
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2011 15:43:24 -0400
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org

--==_Exmh_1301946204_4775P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

On Mon, 04 Apr 2011 14:30:41 CDT, Jason Baugher said:

> I suppose theoretically that a ToS could be crafted that would allow the 
> vendor to release customer information in the case of ANY suspected 
> abuse, but do you really think that would make a difference to "The Bad 
> Guys"?

A better question - would it make a difference to The Bad Guys if the ToS
included a "Name and Shame" clause, where if they were terminated for cause the
fact *would* be publicized?


--==_Exmh_1301946204_4775P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001

iD8DBQFNmh9ccC3lWbTT17ARAiQ+AJoCOyBYAEvUjd9O/ZkgAC7RMpGi/wCfRqgq
tl9Xvv/XjAlPTpS82ktf/9o=
=PYU3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--==_Exmh_1301946204_4775P--



home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post