[139319] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

State of QoS peering in Nanog

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Francois Menard)
Sat Apr 2 16:00:44 2011

From: Francois Menard <francois@menards.ca>
Date: Sat, 2 Apr 2011 16:00:30 -0400
To: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org

Folks,

The Canadian telecommunications regulator, the CRTC, has just launched a =
public notice with possible worldwide implications IMHO, Telecom Notice =
of Consultation CRTC 2011-206:

http://www.crtc.gc.ca/eng/archive/2011/2011-206.htm

I think this is the very first regulatory inquiry into IP to IP =
interconnection for PSTN local interconnection.

One of the postulates that I intend to defend, is that in the PSTN =
today, in addition to interconnecting for the purpose of exchanging =
voice calls, it is possible to LOCALLY (at the Local Interconnection =
Region, roughly a US LATA) interconnect with guaranteed QoS for ISDN =
video conferencing.

In other words, there is more to PSTN interconnection than the support =
of the G.711 CODEC.  Other CODECs are supported, such as H.320.

This brings me to a point. Why should we loose this important feature of =
the PSTN, support for multiple CODECs, as we carelessly bottom level =
IP-IP interconnection to G.711 only.

Video conferencing on the Internet, particularly at high resolution, is =
not a reality today to say the least, foregoing of guessing what the =
future will hold.


Why not consider HD audio ?

Therefore:

A) I want to capture all instances where this issue has been addressed =
worldwide.

B) I also want to understand what is going on, insofar as enabling =
guaranteed QoS peering across BGP-4 interconnections in the Nanog =
community.

C) I also want to understand whether there is inter-service-provider =
RSVP or other per-session QoS establishment protocols.

I call upon the Nanog community to consider this proceeding as very =
important and contribute to this thread.

And I will try to provide a forum for discussing this outside of Nanog =
when required.

Regards,

-=3DFrancois=3D-



home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post