[139278] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: =?utf-8?B?UmU6IHY2IEF2aWFuIENhcnJpZXJzPw==?=
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu)
Fri Apr 1 11:02:51 2011
To: =?utf-8?B?R1AgV29vZGVu?= <graham@g-rock.net>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 01 Apr 2011 09:30:45 CDT."
<E1Q5fO8-0003K8-La@s0.nanog.org>
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2011 11:01:42 -0400
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
--==_Exmh_1301670102_4880P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Fri, 01 Apr 2011 09:30:45 CDT, =?utf-8?B?R1AgV29vZGVu?= said:
> wonder on the carrier would survive a DoS attack ...
RFC1149 says:
Avian carriers can provide high delay, low throughput, and low
altitude service. The connection topology is limited to a single
point-to-point path for each carrier, used with standard carriers,
but many carriers can be used without significant interference with
each other, outside of early spring. This is because of the 3D ether
space available to the carriers, in contrast to the 1D ether used by
IEEE802.3. The carriers have an intrinsic collision avoidance
system, which increases availability.
The carriers are also (over time) self-regenerating in case one gets lost or
corrupted due to collision or interception...
--==_Exmh_1301670102_4880P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001
iD8DBQFNlejWcC3lWbTT17ARAg0tAKDB4m4Jwbog0uiROgKyQiWqgQaHegCfQB1O
U4zR7X5OAxVzAPJXaC73snY=
=dkuh
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--==_Exmh_1301670102_4880P--
