[139276] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: v6 Avian Carriers?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Scott Morris)
Fri Apr 1 10:01:37 2011
Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2011 16:01:21 +0200
From: Scott Morris <swm@emanon.com>
To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <DC8E31C01757B14EB9DFF2F0B6DA4F0C2BF0DF041F@FHDP1LUMXC7V21.us.one.verizon.com>
Reply-To: swm@emanon.com
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
Mmm... Good question. Would it actually come back OUT in a
recognizable (de-encapsulated) manner?
I'll vote with packet loss, 'cause tunneling seems pretty gross. ;)
Scott
On 4/1/11 2:41 PM, Sachs, Marcus Hans (Marc) wrote:
> I was wondering which April 1st this would happen on. Now I know. So if a v6 carrier swallows a v4 datagram does that count as packet loss or tunneling?
>
> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6214/
>
>
> Marc
>
>
>
