[139201] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: ICANN approves .XXX red-light district for the Internet

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Joel Jaeggli)
Tue Mar 29 12:42:47 2011

Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2011 09:41:32 -0700
From: Joel Jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com>
To: Marshall Eubanks <tme@americafree.tv>
In-Reply-To: <421753CA-DAE5-4939-A4C5-366A65C54C27@americafree.tv>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org

On 3/29/11 9:32 AM, Marshall Eubanks wrote:
> 
> On Mar 29, 2011, at 11:25 AM, Tony Finch wrote:
> 
>> George Bonser <gbonser@seven.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> What bothers me is that most companies are now going to be forced to
>>> purchase .xxx domains simply to keep someone else from buying it and
>>> sullying the company's image.
>>
>> Who is forcing them?
> 
> Their lawyers.

given that domain registration is cheaper than billable hours I don't
see the problem.

> Regards
> Marshall
> 
> 
>>
>> Tony.
>> -- 
>> f.anthony.n.finch  <dot@dotat.at>  http://dotat.at/
>> Shannon: Southerly, veering westerly at times, 4 or 5, increasing 6 or 7 at
>> times. Moderate or rough. Rain or showers, fog patches. Good, occasionally
>> very poor.
>>
>>
> 
> 



home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post