[139118] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Using Region-X assigned IP space in Region-Y?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Zaid Ali)
Sun Mar 27 14:03:16 2011
Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2011 11:03:10 -0700
From: Zaid Ali <zaid@zaidali.com>
To: Jima <nanog@jima.tk>,
<nanog@nanog.org>
In-Reply-To: <4D8F79EC.1080805@jima.tk>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On 3/27/11 10:54 AM, "Jima" <nanog@jima.tk> wrote:
> On 3/27/2011 12:10 PM, Zaid Ali wrote:
>> On 3/27/11 8:19 AM, "Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu"<Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu>
>> wrote:
>>> There's only one question to be asked - will the (possibly new) upstream
>>> of the moved datacenter announce the route for the /24 or not?
>>
>> Why would the new upstream refuse to announce the /24 assuming he has the
>> correct information for his route objects and visible through the RIR
>> database.
>
> Some transit providers dislike announcing smaller networks, and thus
> have lower limits.
>
> Jima
>
Then the said transit provider customer will turn off the circuit and move
to the next transit provider that doesn't have a problem with /24. If you
are in a monopolistic ISP environment then it is different and that is a
different topicof discussion. Sadly been there done that.
Zaid
