[139085] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: ICANN approves .XXX red-light district for the Internet
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (John R. Levine)
Sat Mar 26 17:43:59 2011
Date: 26 Mar 2011 17:43:11 -0400
From: "John R. Levine" <johnl@iecc.com>
To: "William Herrin" <bill@herrin.us>
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimwJ+7R5fw6RDO1fOv1zBCd+BQ84MozNx-Akovu@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text,
while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools.
--3825401791-1635476512-1301175326=:58352
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE
Content-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1103261736281.58352@joyce.lan>
> US Code TITLE 18 > PART I > CHAPTER 71 > =C2=A7 1470
> http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/18/usc_sec_18_00001470----000-.html
That law includes the phrase "knowing that such other individual has not=20
attained the age of 16 years." That's why porn sites have a home page=20
that asks you how old you are. As far as I can tell from looking for case=
=20
law, all the 1470 cases are basically child molestation cases where the=20
1470 count was piled on in addition to the real charges, unrelated to kids=
=20
looking for porn sites.
So, in short, there's no problem for .XXX to solve.
Regards,
John Levine, johnl@iecc.com, Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for Dummi=
es",
Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. http://jl.ly
--3825401791-1635476512-1301175326=:58352--
