[139083] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: ICANN approves .XXX red-light district for the Internet
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (William Herrin)
Sat Mar 26 17:26:49 2011
In-Reply-To: <20110326211328.54951.qmail@joyce.lan>
From: William Herrin <bill@herrin.us>
Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2011 17:26:24 -0400
To: John Levine <johnl@iecc.com>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 5:13 PM, John Levine <johnl@iecc.com> wrote:
>>If the creation of .xxx is a preliminary step in making the fact of
>>your web site only being accessible by a name ending in .xxx an
>>affirmative defense against a charge of allowing minors to access your
>>site then
>
> A charge of what? =A0ICM and .XXX are headquartered in Florida. =A0Could
> you give some examples of the laws you're referring to
US Code TITLE 18 > PART I > CHAPTER 71 > =A7 1470
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/18/usc_sec_18_00001470----000-.html
>, and cases
> where people have been convicted under them?
Regards,
Bill Herrin
--=20
William D. Herrin ................ herrin@dirtside.com=A0 bill@herrin.us
3005 Crane Dr. ...................... Web: <http://bill.herrin.us/>
Falls Church, VA 22042-3004
