[139081] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: ICANN approves .XXX red-light district for the Internet
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (John Levine)
Sat Mar 26 17:14:30 2011
Date: 26 Mar 2011 21:13:28 -0000
From: "John Levine" <johnl@iecc.com>
To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTim0VanMAcvEjGOdK+40xw_QtrvVRVWLu2GuQ+cC@mail.gmail.com>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
>If the creation of .xxx is a preliminary step in making the fact of
>your web site only being accessible by a name ending in .xxx an
>affirmative defense against a charge of allowing minors to access your
>site then
A charge of what? ICM and .XXX are headquartered in Florida. Could
you give some examples of the laws you're referring to, and cases
where people have been convicted under them?
R's,
John
