[139043] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Peering Traffic Volume
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Bill Woodcock)
Fri Mar 25 15:00:34 2011
From: Bill Woodcock <woody@pch.net>
In-Reply-To: <4B46DD5F-9C83-44B4-8556-D6B9900289ED@ianai.net>
Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2011 11:59:34 -0700
To: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Mar 25, 2011, at 10:51 AM, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
> The question is whether "some data" is better than "no data". =
Honestly, I'm not sure.
Yes, Patrick, I was just trying to be diplomatic about saying "not such =
a good idea" so he'd keep reading through to the end, where I suggested =
some other, possibly better, research topics. I am, however, certain =
that other people could suggest even better research topics. Good =
research topics are in demonstrably short supply among networking =
grad-students, so if y'all want to be helpful...
-Bill
