[138882] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: SORBS contact?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Steve Atkins)
Tue Mar 22 17:56:31 2011
From: Steve Atkins <steve@blighty.com>
In-Reply-To: <4D88F6D4.5070901@tiedyenetworks.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2011 14:56:20 -0700
To: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Mar 22, 2011, at 12:21 PM, Mike wrote:
> On 03/22/2011 12:14 PM, Paul Graydon wrote:
>> On 03/22/2011 09:07 AM, Chris Conn wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>=20
>>> Thank you to all that answered, all helpful info. Surprisingly =
minutes
>>> after my Nanog post, a couple of my tickets saw action and the /24 =
was
>>> finally removed a short while later.
>>>=20
>>> Thanks again,
>>>=20
>>> Chris
>>>=20
>> Woah... *collapses on the floor in shock* SORBS actually did =
something?!
>> Quick, buy a lottery ticket before your luck changes!
>>=20
>> Paul
>> (one of many fed up of dealing with SORBS)
>=20
>=20
> Yeah +1 to that. What we need an RBL that lists any mail server that =
USES sorbs for filtering decisions.
Cut GFI a little slack, at least for a few more weeks.
They seem to have made some decent decisions w.r.t. SORBS very recently =
and it's likely that things will be improving, at least as far as SORBS =
policies and support responsiveness are concerned.
They may yet screw it up, but give them a chance to demonstrate =
otherwise.
Cheers,
Steve
