[138876] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: DWDM Metro Access Design
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Alexander Harrowell)
Tue Mar 22 06:21:50 2011
From: Alexander Harrowell <a.harrowell@gmail.com>
To: nanog@nanog.org
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2011 10:19:33 +0000
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTikyk4-e_fuhpx5Bw2wbs7UzhQu=rXLL-+kHooyc@mail.gmail.com>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
--nextPart4478485.2n7Ec6Bu4Y
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
What's the constraint that rules out using SONET or something similar, whic=
h is=20
designed to give you a robust ring topology? I think it's probably quite=20
important to know whether that's really, absolutely out of the question, or=
=20
whether it's a possibility to relax that in favour of a less painful higher=
=20
layer solution.
=2D-=20
The only thing worse than e-mail disclaimers...is people who send e-mail to=
=20
lists complaining about them
--nextPart4478485.2n7Ec6Bu4Y
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEABECAAYFAk2Id8AACgkQ0c69vkueJcTduACdEqtaDGHkH4t/OHzpNPb2pLFe
LngAnAvEgWKORETMIBCz9Dh2kj1EUTTV
=LFSs
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--nextPart4478485.2n7Ec6Bu4Y--
