[138861] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Weekly Routing Table Report
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Robert Kisteleki)
Mon Mar 21 06:06:34 2011
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2011 11:06:24 +0100
From: Robert Kisteleki <robert@ripe.net>
To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <89DC638D-DB0E-453A-A1D7-47BB2E892A2C@apnic.net>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On 2011.03.19. 23:40, Geoff Huston wrote:
>
> On 19/03/2011, at 6:08 AM, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 19 Mar 2011, Routing Analysis Role Account wrote:
>>
>>> Number of 32-bit ASNs allocated by the RIRs: 1207
>>> Prefixes from 32-bit ASNs in the Routing Table: 1
>>
>> Is the report not getting the routes from the real 32bit ASNs or is the above figures really accurate?
>
> Its probably not getting the routes - I see 915 AS's in the routing table using 32 bit AS numbers (http://www.potaroo.net/tools/asn32/)
>
> Geoff
In RIS we saw 918 32 bit ASNs advertising about 2200 prefixes on 2011-03-19.
Robert
