|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |
From: "Patrick W. Gilmore" <patrick@ianai.net> In-Reply-To: <55275.1300660162@localhost> Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2011 18:35:35 -0400 To: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org> Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 - -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Mar 20, 2011, at 6:29 PM, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu wrote: > On Mon, 21 Mar 2011 08:44:50 +1100, Skeeve Stevens said: >=20 >> http://www.eintellego.net/public/CSINY.s07e17-fakev6.jpg >>=20 >> Promoting IPv6 =3D Win! >> Dodgy Address =3D Fail! >=20 > Intentional Fail, probably, similar to how most phone numbers on a TV = show are > in the 555 exchange. You put a number on TV, and drunk idiots will = call it, as > a number of annoyed people found out after Tommy Tutone had an actual = hit > song... 257 seems to be a popular octet value. >=20 > (Personally, I'm surprised 148.18.1.193 got used in that image) So am I. But I'm surprised 1918 space was used as well. ANY v4 address = will get typed into ping or a browser or something by someone if it is = on TV. How many corporations have 1918 space that their VPN'ed home = users are about to abuse because of that? Is 127.0.0.1 / ::1 the Internet version of "555"? Or will "I hurt = myself, so now I'm going to sue you" mean we can't even use that? - - --=20 TTFN, patrick - -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (Darwin) iEYEARECAAYFAk2GgTEACgkQznMLL4aoth+u3wCglGK+yrFj3PhI61O78IEqQ40V KyMAoK0MJ26OxPab10za4LQ6U8qomrPU =3DuJz7 - -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (Darwin) iEYEARECAAYFAk2GgTcACgkQznMLL4aoth9c8ACgkT0XYIAsZ2IORlYH+nopOLmH z/sAoLILGcEnxhR1QHXnU+NvJPDuaYvT =3DRNrE -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |