[138840] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: Weekly Routing Table Report

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Geoff Huston)
Sat Mar 19 18:41:47 2011

From: Geoff Huston <gih@apnic.net>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1103182007150.4842@uplift.swm.pp.se>
Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2011 09:40:43 +1100
To: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org


On 19/03/2011, at 6:08 AM, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:

> On Sat, 19 Mar 2011, Routing Analysis Role Account wrote:
>=20
>> Number of 32-bit ASNs allocated by the RIRs:                       =
1207
>> Prefixes from 32-bit ASNs in the Routing Table:                       =
1
>=20
> Is the report not getting the routes from the real 32bit ASNs or is =
the above figures really accurate?

Its probably not getting the routes - I see 915 AS's in the routing =
table using 32 bit AS numbers (http://www.potaroo.net/tools/asn32/)

  Geoff




home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post