|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |
From: Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com> In-Reply-To: <607343.20821.qm@web120911.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2011 09:13:11 -0700 To: Andrew Elliott <andrellio@yahoo.com> Cc: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org> Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org On Mar 15, 2011, at 6:46 AM, Andrew Elliott wrote: >> "Larger than default"? There are rules about allocating IP space, it = has to do=20 >> with justification, not default sizes. >=20 > Right, by "default" I was referring to a default minimum size block = assigned to=20 > a particular product (I would guess this would normally be in the = range of /29=20 > to /27). I understand justification would be required (I hope), but I = was=20 > thinking of this from the perspective of trying to put the onus on the=20= > customer's to have an incentive for using their provider assigned = blocks in the=20 > most efficient way. >=20 IMHO, the ideal default prefix size for any end-site is still /48. (someone had to say it) Owen
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |