[138388] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Real World NAT64 deployments
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (JORDI PALET MARTINEZ)
Fri Mar 4 04:26:24 2011
X-Envelope-From: jordi.palet@consulintel.es
X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: nanog@nanog.org
Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2011 10:25:17 +0100
From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.palet@consulintel.es>
To: <nanog@nanog.org>
In-Reply-To: <m239n3z1i8.wl%randy@psg.com>
Reply-To: jordi.palet@consulintel.es
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
Hi Randy,
I don't advocate for 6to4. I'm for dual-stack, even with IPv4 private
addresses and NAT, which is what we have today.
However, we like it or not 6to4 is there in many platforms, and the best
we can do is to deploy 6to4 relays in both sides, ISPs and content
providers. That will minimise the problem. I think some other folks in the
list already said it many times.
I think is much much much better having 6to4 and relays than nothing. Same
observations for Teredo.
Regards,
Jordi
-----Mensaje original-----
De: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
Responder a: <randy@psg.com>
Fecha: Fri, 04 Mar 2011 18:19:27 +0900
Para: Jordi Palet Martinez <jordi.palet@consulintel.es>
CC: <nanog@nanog.org>
Asunto: Re: Real World NAT64 deployments
>> 6to4 is an automatic transition mechanism
> ^ non-
>
>which allows an end site to have horrible v6 pseudo-connectivity over a
>provider who has not deployed ipv6
>
>randy
**********************************************
IPv4 is over
Are you ready for the new Internet ?
http://www.consulintel.es
The IPv6 Company
This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the use of the individual(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, including attached files, is prohibited.
