[138371] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Real World NAT64 deployments
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Leo Bicknell)
Thu Mar 3 21:04:13 2011
Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2011 18:03:26 -0800
From: Leo Bicknell <bicknell@ufp.org>
To: nanog@nanog.org
Mail-Followup-To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=rJ2=XrBQJG1QiBJUeL_w0KxqJAGaVF3Bx9VC-@mail.gmail.com>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
--TB36FDmn/VVEgNH/
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
In a message written on Thu, Mar 03, 2011 at 08:27:18PM -0500, TJ wrote:
> And 6to4 doesn't allow IPv6 to talk to IPv4, contrary to what the name se=
ems
> to imply :).
>=20
> Some poorly chosen names for our tunneling, yes?
I think 6automaticallyover4 was determined to be too long. :P
--=20
Leo Bicknell - bicknell@ufp.org - CCIE 3440
PGP keys at http://www.ufp.org/~bicknell/
--TB36FDmn/VVEgNH/
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.13 (FreeBSD)
iQIVAwUBTXBIbrN3O8aJIdTMAQJhWBAApPWF2fp9+ekkkTolKetGDeTAWlz9cw0S
Fe32VnfZErxUFluL5efd7D2hhAb+v8geRGpgnUBuYc36NpkOMsESGMop0J9Aw/wC
NtiiEIuB+oxuNUFmbgFw0v9R13XD/Ud2h7BcFfg95DD0mGvPTiNXRAjqu19ogXqy
ElHOKPviKH65t9Mf1zP8kUKGuIenJRzkQumfPow/CO9xvBR39xEAvFKgzt4Lk9kx
+uSKIk3Y1Td7FnH0IqBkZZXnPBS0faoi0JsvDALLdJQrxcKs7JSgN75+ri7uz+Qe
WpFJ52BNiXyz4ZbKciT6TcjZP8rTtTTer2OWrDBqRqkrfaiNw3O8QieYnoHQy+3X
43nOv5zHNkTl3Bc+PDVtDonB6lrUqHmmLSyKdHJoSVzFe18BwNyPqNYsNgpAKgtZ
1R1veXmevj0CaMaYt8nLMTTYyZVdEUatuv7s6EKkCSzz6HjXFX6Ux+yHf5BqzIeR
xLLt57I200o6HDOeiMiC6SrIyebUahOWCfE8edtFkt69nq1KJ+T8NOy/ivNdXnqS
vsCv7IOcwo/rc+NLb1womFVL5PmQTYHlD+SxNvF/3JX75P/AIUZ/BzW8Qrle1GgP
sR4fDY1ZU3D/3BV/aHfkybliocYIBfMcqx4EX7pymAiSJKFxKJLsAtOyNyijkgux
5TgCdAQ7tMM=
=hToD
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--TB36FDmn/VVEgNH/--
