|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |
Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2011 14:57:28 -0800 In-Reply-To: <AANLkTinouwkKoNjA3owVHaoHmVYuGCH11jrap4Po72Ho@mail.gmail.com> From: "George Bonser" <gbonser@seven.com> To: "Elliot Finley" <efinley.lists@gmail.com>, <nanog@nanog.org> Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org > From: Elliot Finley=20 > Sent: Thursday, March 03, 2011 12:31 PM > To: nanog@nanog.org > Subject: Real World NAT64 deployments >=20 > So as not to re-invent the wheel - if you are currently doing NAT64 in > production and are willing to share: >=20 > What software/hardware are you using? >=20 > Why? >=20 > TIA > Elliot Ok, apparently there is NAT64 and there is NAT64. I don't believe the poster was talking about a v6 load balancer VIP with v4 servers. I think the OP is talking about the NAT64 portion of NAT64/DNS64 where native v6 source and destination IPs are NATed to v4 destination and source IPs for communicating with v4 resources from a v6 host. =20 But I might be projecting my own needs here. So, what kind of NAT64 are we talking about? George
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |