[138306] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Switch with 24x SFP PVLAN QinQ Layer 2
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Adam Armstrong)
Wed Mar 2 14:33:29 2011
Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2011 19:39:40 +0000
From: Adam Armstrong <lists@memetic.org>
To: James Brown <jamesbbrown04@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTikDt2BHP1v5c1uyeiuvYLWV+0H6b_M4+6rHGPGF@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: Nanog <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On 02/03/2011 19:19, James Brown wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 1:26 PM, Rubens Kuhl <rubensk@gmail.com
> <mailto:rubensk@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> > Requirements are basically just 24/48 SFP ports, PVLAN and
> selective QinQ.
> > Most devices that fit the requirements are Layer 3, which pushes
> the cost
> > per port too high.
>
> Cisco ME6524 has a model with 32 SFP ports (24 with 3:1
> oversubscription, 8 non-oversubscribed) and "IP Base" IOS which has
> very limited L3 features (RIP and EIGRP stub only), focused on Layer 2
> deployments.
>
>
> Rubens
>
> The ME3600X might be more a more appropriate Cisco solution than the
> ME6524. The ME3600X is one of the current metro MDU access CPE device
> of choice.
>
> 2x10GE and 24xGE SFP or Copper versions with Metro Feature set.
>
> http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps10956/index.html
>
> *In the spirit of full disclosure I am biased towards this vendor
Still much too expensive :)
adam.
