[138121] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Mac OS X 10.7, still no DHCPv6
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Dobbins, Roland)
Mon Feb 28 11:35:33 2011
From: "Dobbins, Roland" <rdobbins@arbor.net>
To: nanog group <nanog@nanog.org>
Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2011 16:34:34 +0000
In-Reply-To: <7B8766B1-55EC-49C1-BCCA-E6D0917EA63A@delong.com>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Feb 28, 2011, at 11:14 PM, Owen DeLong wrote:
> IPv6-only viability is the real goal. This is, in the long run, a trans=
ition from v4 to v6. Dual-stack is an interim stop-gap, not an end
> solution.
I think most everyone agrees with this. However, getting experience with d=
ual-stack is better than no experience with IPv6 at all.
This doesn't mean that dual-stack should be rolled out everywhere; just tha=
t doing so may in fact make sense in some situations, and will often result=
in folks getting some operational experience with IPv6 vs. none at all unt=
il some time in the distant future.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Roland Dobbins <rdobbins@arbor.net> // <http://www.arbornetworks.com>
The basis of optimism is sheer terror.
-- Oscar Wilde
