|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |
Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2011 15:10:21 +0900 From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> To: Steven Bellovin <smb@cs.columbia.edu> In-Reply-To: <071A89DA-A414-4DCC-BC47-3C86AB67EFE0@cs.columbia.edu> Cc: nanog group <nanog@nanog.org> Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org > I'm not saying there are no uses for DHCPv6, though I suspect > that some of the reasons proposed are more people wanting to do > things the way they always do, rather than making small changes > and ending up with equivalent effort. add noc and doc costs of all changes, please randy
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |