[138035] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Weekend Gedankenexperiment - The Kill Switch
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Fernando Gont)
Sun Feb 27 16:08:51 2011
Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2011 18:05:46 -0300
From: Fernando Gont <fernando@gont.com.ar>
To: dcrocker@bbiw.net
In-Reply-To: <4D4EF1D1.7050708@dcrocker.net>
Cc: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
Hi, Dave,
On 06/02/2011 04:09 p.m., Dave CROCKER wrote:
> Sorry, but I think the technical implications of a goal to survive
> 'hostile battlefield conditions' versus 'nuclear attack' are (small pun)
> massively different. Hence I think the actual language used matters.
>
> And the fact that the common language around the net during the '70s was
> the former and not the latter matters. Which is why it would be helpful
> to get some credible documentation about use of the latter.
How about:
Clark, D. 1988. "The Design Philosophy of the DARPA Internet Protocols".
Computer Communication Review, Vol. 18, No. 4, 1988.
?
Thanks,
--
Fernando Gont
e-mail: fernando@gont.com.ar || fgont@acm.org
PGP Fingerprint: 7809 84F5 322E 45C7 F1C9 3945 96EE A9EF D076 FFF1
