[137947] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: ARIN and IPv6 Requests
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Owen DeLong)
Thu Feb 24 02:34:52 2011
From: Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com>
In-Reply-To: <4D65F896.4070706@bogus.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2011 23:30:29 -0800
To: Joel Jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
I discussed this with Randy Whitney a few months ago. He informed me =
that they had
been taking down to /48s for some time now.
Owen
On Feb 23, 2011, at 10:20 PM, Joel Jaeggli wrote:
> On 2/23/11 10:10 PM, Chris Woodfield wrote:
>> (Yeah, high reply latency...)
>>=20
>> Is Carrier V still filtering at sub-/32 on their IPv6 peerings? Last =
I was in a position to check, not even Apple's /45 was visible from =
inside AS701.
>=20
> evidence says that they are now accepting longer prefixes.
>=20
>> -C
>>=20
>> On Feb 10, 2011, at 12:25 PM, Eric Clark wrote:
>>=20
>>> Don't remember about the v4 part, but 3 years ago they issued me a =
/48, specifically for my first site and indicated that a block was =
reserved for additional sites. I can probably dig that up.
>>>=20
>>> Sent from my iPad
>>>=20
>>> On Feb 10, 2011, at 12:18 PM, Jason Iannone =
<jason.iannone@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>=20
>>>> It also looks like there isn't a policy for orgs with multiple
>>>> multihomed sites to get a /48 per site. Is there an exception =
policy
>>>> somewhere?
>>>>=20
>>>> On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 12:50 PM, <ADWebb@dstsystems.com> wrote:
>>>>> Initial. Documenting IPv4 usage is in the request template.
>>>>>=20
>>>>> --
>>>>> Adam Webb
>>>>>=20
>>>>>=20
>>>>>=20
>>>>>=20
>>>>>=20
>>>>> From:
>>>>> "Nick Olsen" <nick@flhsi.com>
>>>>> To:
>>>>> <nanog@nanog.org>
>>>>> Date:
>>>>> 02/10/2011 01:45 PM
>>>>> Subject:
>>>>> re: ARIN and IPv6 Requests
>>>>>=20
>>>>>=20
>>>>>=20
>>>>> We requested our initial allocation without any such questions. Is =
this
>>>>> your initial or additional?
>>>>>=20
>>>>> Nick Olsen
>>>>> Network Operations
>>>>> (855) FLSPEED x106
>>>>>=20
>>>>> ----------------------------------------
>>>>>=20
>>>>> From: ADWebb@dstsystems.com
>>>>> Sent: Thursday, February 10, 2011 2:38 PM
>>>>> To: nanog@nanog.org
>>>>> Subject: ARIN and IPv6 Requests
>>>>>=20
>>>>> Why does ARIN require detailed usage of IPv4 space when requesting =
IPv6
>>>>> space? Seems completely irrelevant to me.
>>>>>=20
>>>>> --
>>>>> Adam Webb
>>>>> EN & ES Team
>>>>> desk: 816.737.9717
>>>>> cell: 916.949.1345
>>>>> ---------------------------------------
>>>>> The biggest secret of innovation is that anyone can do it.
>>>>> ---------------------------------------
>>>>>=20
>>>>> -----------------------------------------
>>>>> Please consider the environment before printing this email and any
>>>>> attachments.
>>>>>=20
>>>>> This e-mail and any attachments are intended only for the
>>>>> individual or company to which it is addressed and may contain
>>>>> information which is privileged, confidential and prohibited from
>>>>> disclosure or unauthorized use under applicable law. If you are
>>>>> not the intended recipient of this e-mail, you are hereby notified
>>>>> that any use, dissemination, or copying of this e-mail or the
>>>>> information contained in this e-mail is strictly prohibited by the
>>>>> sender. If you have received this transmission in error, please
>>>>> return the material received to the sender and delete all copies
>>>>> from your system.
>>>>>=20
>>>>>=20
>>>>>=20
>>>>=20
>>>=20
>>=20
>>=20
>>=20
>=20
