[137914] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: SmartNet Alternatives
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Richey)
Tue Feb 22 17:10:44 2011
From: "Richey" <mylists@battleop.com>
To: <neil@domino.org>,
<gbonser@seven.com>,
<tbraning@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <1297850165.v2.mailanyonewebmail-761213@fuseweb2d>
Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2011 17:10:02 -0500
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
I've used them as well and they have been pretty good with gear that's =
common place. Just be careful if you get off the beaten path and are =
using gear like an IAD-2431-16FXS. They can help you with the hardware =
side on that kind of stuff but not so much with the software.
Richey
-----Original Message-----
From: Neil J. McRae [mailto:neil@domino.org]=20
Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2011 4:56 AM
To: gbonser@seven.com; tbraning@gmail.com
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: SmartNet Alternatives
I've used NHR for a number of deployments over the past couple of years =
and they are a fantastic organisation to work with. I've used them for =
maintenance support in the US for replacement of parts - highly =
recommended.
----- Original Message -----
From: tbraning@gmail.com
Sent: Tue, February 15, 2011, 11:04 PM
Subject: Re: SmartNet Alternatives
I know NHR has a alternative that looks to be comparable.
http://www.networkhardware.com/Maintenance/
-tb
