[137822] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: [arin-ppml] NAT444 rumors (was Re: Looking for an IPv6
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Zed Usser)
Sun Feb 20 06:28:09 2011
Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2011 03:27:57 -0800 (PST)
From: Zed Usser <zzuser@yahoo.com>
To: Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com>
In-Reply-To: <EF6ADAA2-0866-41A9-A558-1D52DCB52065@delong.com>
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
--- On Sun, 2/20/11, Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com> wrote:
> Oh, I expect CGN/LSN to be connectivity of last resort, no
> question.
Ok, so let's just deploy it and not even try to fix it? Even when it is a required functionality for IPv6-only hosts to access the IPv4 domain? That'll go down real well with end-users and really cut down on the operational and support issues enumerated earlier.
- Zed
