[137802] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: [arin-ppml] NAT444 rumors (was Re: Looking for an IPv6
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Zed Usser)
Sat Feb 19 14:31:44 2011
Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2011 11:31:36 -0800 (PST)
From: Zed Usser <zzuser@yahoo.com>
To: Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com>
In-Reply-To: <4DD50F56-49FD-4A0F-A6FC-5A9907DBE822@delong.com>
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
--- On Sun, 2/20/11, Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com> wrote:=0A>>=A0 So, in es=
sence, you are advocating not to=0A>> interconnect the IPv4-only and IPv6-=
only domains in any way?=0A>=0A> I'm advocating not depending on any such i=
nteraction=0A> working as it's pretty clear that=0A> the available solution=
set is fairly broken.=0A Fair enough. This approach will, however, relega=
te IPv6-only networks to second class citizenship status. Access to the "re=
al" Internet will require IPv4 and IPv6-only will be seen as the inferior c=
hoice, to be avoided as best as you can. Not quite a ringing endorsement fo=
r IPv6, in other words.=0A=0A This position also assumes that there will b=
e enough IPv4 addresses to go around for everybody to dual stack. Anybody n=
ot so fortunate will simply be left out in the cold.=0A=0A- Zed=0A=0A=0A =
