[137796] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: [arin-ppml] NAT444 rumors (was Re: Looking for an IPv6
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Zed Usser)
Sat Feb 19 03:41:17 2011
Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2011 00:41:08 -0800 (PST)
From: Zed Usser <zzuser@yahoo.com>
To: Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com>
In-Reply-To: <6475D41F-E5F1-4F38-A3C0-BE1A52F6069E@delong.com>
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
--- On Sat, 2/19/11, Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com> wrote:=0A> >=A0 Are you =
willing to bet that IPv4 address=0A> exhaustion will not result in IPv6-onl=
y hosts before we run=0A> out of meaningful IPv4-only hosts?=0A> No, but, I=
am willing to bet that we will not meaningfully=0A> make the situation bet=
ter for those IPv4-only hosts or the IPv6-only=0A> hosts attempting to reac=
h them by any mechanism more efficient=0A> than encouraging them to add IPv=
6 capability, whether or not=0A> that happens after the fact.=0A So, in es=
sence, you are advocating not to interconnect the IPv4-only and IPv6-only d=
omains in any way? =0A=0A- Zed=0A=0A=0A=0A
