[137698] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: IPv6 mistakes, was: Re: Looking for an IPv6 naysayer...
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Iljitsch van Beijnum)
Fri Feb 18 06:56:19 2011
From: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com>
In-Reply-To: <4D5E59B3.9020307@redpill-linpro.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 12:54:46 +0100
To: Tore Anderson <tore.anderson@redpill-linpro.com>
Cc: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On 18 feb 2011, at 12:36, Tore Anderson wrote:
>> Each of those /8 is
>> "administered" by a RIR, but it's unclear (to me at least) whether
>> that means that RIR gets to give out that space in its region or not.
> The unused space in the ERX blocks were divided evenly between the =
RIRs
> a couple of years ago, see:
> http://www.icann.org/correspondence/wilson-to-conrad-28jan08-en.pdf
"Please find attached a summary spreadsheet (Excel format) providing the =
agreed distribution of administrative responsibility"
This still leaves the question of which RIR gets to give out which parts =
of the unused legacy space unanswered.=
