[137694] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: [arin-ppml] NAT444 rumors (was Re: Looking for an IPv6
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Iljitsch van Beijnum)
Fri Feb 18 06:05:07 2011
From: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com>
In-Reply-To: <921881.85954.qm@web114701.mail.gq1.yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 12:04:57 +0100
To: Zed Usser <zzuser@yahoo.com>
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On 18 feb 2011, at 9:24, Zed Usser wrote:
> Basic Internet services will work (web browsing, email, Facebook, =
Youtube,...), but:
> - Less torrenting
> - Less Netflix watching
> - Less FTP downloads
> - Less video streaming in general (webcams, etc.)
You forget:
- no IPv6 tunnels
Deploying NAT444 without IPv6 is a very bad thing.=
