[137659] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: [arin-ppml] NAT444 rumors (was Re: Looking for an IPv6
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Chris Grundemann)
Thu Feb 17 20:54:39 2011
In-Reply-To: <4C060A07-4FA7-467B-8BA8-8D4D04A0BA9A@queuefull.net>
Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 18:54:30 -0700
From: Chris Grundemann <cgrundemann@gmail.com>
To: Benson Schliesser <bensons@queuefull.net>
Cc: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>, ARIN-PPML List <arin-ppml@arin.net>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 14:17, Benson Schliesser <bensons@queuefull.net> wr=
ote:
> If you have more experience (not including rumors) that suggests otherwis=
e, I'd very much like to hear about it. =A0I'm open to the possibility that=
NAT444 breaks stuff - that feels right in my gut - but I haven't found any=
valid evidence of this.
In case you have not already found this:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-donley-nat444-impacts-01
Cheers,
~Chris
>
> Regardless, I think we can agree that IPv6 is the way to avoid NAT-relate=
d growing pains. =A0We've known this for a long time.
>
> Cheers,
> -Benson
>
> _______________________________________________
> PPML
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML@arin.net).
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
> Please contact info@arin.net if you experience any issues.
>
--=20
@ChrisGrundemann
weblog.chrisgrundemann.com
www.burningwiththebush.com
www.theIPv6experts.net
www.coisoc.org
