[137606] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: IPv6 mistakes, was: Re: Looking for an IPv6 naysayer...
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jack Bates)
Thu Feb 17 11:29:52 2011
Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 10:28:19 -0600
From: Jack Bates <jbates@brightok.net>
To: Steven Bellovin <smb@cs.columbia.edu>
In-Reply-To: <D5265C85-50C6-41C3-B18D-4307981A5FC3@cs.columbia.edu>
Cc: John Curran <jcurran@istaff.org>, NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On 2/17/2011 10:24 AM, Steven Bellovin wrote:
> It might be worth doing for ISP backbones, and for things like tunnel endpoints.
> For anything else, it's not worth the effort -- and I suspect never was.
I think several people's point is that it may be useful for the CGN/LSN
numbering and other special case scenarios where a CPE might be
compliant and the windows box would be ignorant.
Jack
