[137589] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: IPv6 mistakes, was: Re: Looking for an IPv6 naysayer...
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu)
Thu Feb 17 09:34:22 2011
To: John Curran <jcurran@istaff.org>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 17 Feb 2011 08:08:50 EST."
<54CC2B0D-EAE0-4B79-AF19-20BBD233A581@istaff.org>
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 09:32:57 -0500
Cc: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
--==_Exmh_1297953177_4878P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Thu, 17 Feb 2011 08:08:50 EST, John Curran said:
> Rather than saying 240/4 is unusable for another three years, perhaps the
> service provider community could make plain that this space needs to be
> made usable
In other words, you're going to tell Granny she needs to upgrade to Windows 8
and/or replace her CPE because you couldn't get your act together and deploy
IPv6 - even though her friends at the bridge club who are customers of
your clued competitor didn't have to do a thing.
And then she has to do something *else* 9 months later when you need to
deploy IPv6 *anyhow*.
I encourage my competitors to design their business plans that way. :)
--==_Exmh_1297953177_4878P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001
iD8DBQFNXTGZcC3lWbTT17ARAvRAAKCpYkBWBMDek45kmMJD8WypcSVOxgCgzNJX
9l+Wu93BWxqZkNyT5T6f/WI=
=qzMQ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--==_Exmh_1297953177_4878P--
